Extradition System And its Applications (law & justice) In sudan Comparative Study

The issue of extradition of criminals is one of the most important aspects of international criminal cooperation. Its rules are set out in the agreements and local criminal legislation in order to prevent perpetrators of criminal acts from escaping accountability and punishment, given the increasing various means that facilitate movement between countries. The significance of the research stems from the fact that the extradition system is one of the most important judicial cooperation mechanisms at the international level. It involves a global interest as a deterrent that prevents criminals from committing their crimes. One of the research’s problems is that some countries view extradition as a prejudice to the sovereignty of the state over its territory. Consequently, they refuse extradition and present excuses in that regard. One of the most important recommendations of the research is to amend the Extradition Act consistent with the Criminal Procedure Act of 1991, whereby the investigating authority would be the Attorney General, rather than the judge, as well as including the Riyadh Agreement of 1983 to the contents of the Sudanese law..

With the increasing seriousness of the criminals in the modern era, especially after the development of means of transportation modern, bringing escaped criminal from the grip of the authorities is easy and states provide in their domestic law for the possibility of extradition of its nationals for crimes committed outside their territory, and seriously considering the possibility of extradition of its nationals to stand obstacle in the way Organized crime. To what extent has the extradition system been able to balance two opposing interests, namely, the development of criminal judicial cooperation between states within the framework of activating extradition procedures and convicts, and